🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.